| Section
C
Today January 30, 2002 Vol. 1, No. 1 Athens, Georgia |
The IT Journal-Constitution |
Mack Baldwin's Home Page. |
|---|
|
My co-worker, Thomas
Moore asks,
"When can you use IT?"
Determining when Instructional Technology is appropriate for instruction
can sometimes be as tricky as deciding the appropriate name to use when
referring to Instructional Technology. However, my personal view
is to think of instruction in terms of simplicity. Learning is not
always easy, and can at times be made more complicated through technology.
Sometimes, technology is not the best answer to solving instructional problems.
In other words, a computer (technology) is not the teacher, it is the teacher's
assistant. Therefore, one must decide whether technology is the best
route to take when designing instruction. Keeping instruction as
simple as possible should be one of the essential goals of achieving learning
objectives, and remembering that technology is a great tool for the enhancement
of learning can help keep instruction simple.
"...technology should be the servant and not the master of instruction. It should not be adopted merely because it exists, or because an institution fears that it will be left behind the parade of progress without it. We also believe that sophisticated technology is not to be equated with saturation. In some courses, the use of technology may be appropriate for a few hours in an entire term. In a few, technology may be constructively used for two-thirds of the hours allotted for a term of instruction; in a very few, it may take over the entire process" (Carnegie Commission on Higher Education, 1972, p. 11). |
|||||||